wIt’s official. You might know a bunch of golddiggers in your social circle – and that’s fine. What’s hilarious? They’re probably dumber than everyone else. It’s science.
We’ve known for years that a lot of women are more likely to pursue rich men – save for those poor saps on millionaire matchmaker. But recent studies have come out revealing that women with lowers IQ’s are generally the ones who pursue rich men. I love how we haven’t cured cancer, AIDS is still a problem, but all of our old people have boners and scientific studies to back up who they should and shouldn’t pursue.
The study was done at the University of Michigan, and confirms why I love bored scientists. Because they will tell you with data things that they don’t really need to, but are interesting to learn anyway. So contrary to your previous conceptions and experiences in the club, there’s an evolutionary reason why Hugh Hefner keeps getting incredibly attractive women who look like they’ve run into walls far too many times.
It makes sense. Women with less education or career prospects pursue men that would allow them to have it. So the next time you’re hanging out in the club, and see people swarming around the tables with bottle service, just applaud the social Darwinism.
(Source)
Comments
O. Theirony
June 30th, 2010 - 7:31:18 AM
"AID's?" How's Beverly Hills?
1
John
June 30th, 2010 - 3:39:51 PM
Interesting study. This must be why there's such a premium on higher-end matchmakers such as Richard Easton; they have connections to females in more respectable circles where the gold-digger syndrome is unlikely. Still, I suspect the richer men that go for low IQ women are still getting something important out of that relationship. That type of dynamic, however, is not for me.
2