There are sometimes that I understand the criticisms of the “liberal media”. Like when they take the time out of their day to talk about people’s boobs.
But everyone loves boobs, don’t they? Boobs are incredibly fun. They’re hypersensitive, look great in underwear and make all people, young and old content. For entirely different reasons. Think of all the great things breasts have bore into our lives. Such as more breasts, motorboating, Victoria’s Secret, Christina Hendricks, you as an infant, awkward sexual encounters.
Now stop reminiscing and think about Sarah Palin. In what had to be the weirdest accusation of any major news organization in history, pundits starting claiming that Sarah Palin was sporting a brand-new pair of fake breasts. This is hilarious for a number of reasons. Not the least being that pundits are basically admitting that they’ve been staring down Sarah Palin’s blouse, when there are much more pressing issues. To the point where she has to deny that she’s had breast implants, which she did to the media.
Seriously? Sarah Palin? Breast implants? There’s no reason for you to care that much. Absolutely no reason. The only time you should be staring at Sarah Palin’s breasts is when you’re eyes stop tracking because you’re in complete shock as to what’s coming out of her mouth.
Comments
Stacey Blaze
June 15th, 2010 - 1:59:42 AM
Sarah Palin is brave, brilliant, beautiful, a feminist fashionista, and the Queen of Conservatism.
1
Lee
June 15th, 2010 - 5:21:37 AM
"no reason for you to care that much" ??? Please... be realistic. It has nothing to do with the "liberal media", but rather the voracious appetite for tabloid journalism that exists in American culture. If she didn't want anybody staring or running photos of her she should have worn something else. Frankly, I thought the implant speculation was merely a pretext for running some photos of $arah's t*ts in a revealing t-shirt.
2
mctaggart
June 15th, 2010 - 6:48:44 AM
@Lee - yes, agreed. Someone somewhere saw a Palin pic of her in a tight t-shirt and decided to put an ambiguous title on a "news" piece. This is the whole media's problem/fault, not just the liberal media's.
3
kenn
June 15th, 2010 - 7:28:01 AM
Liberal media loves ANYONE'S boobs! In fact that's all liberal media IS...a buncha boobs!
4
kenn
June 15th, 2010 - 7:29:20 AM
Palin's boobs? They're also hot for Oblahblah's package...
5
Sally
June 15th, 2010 - 11:16:17 AM
Why blame the liberal media for this? I don't think that MSNBC reported it. It was not a lead story on NBC or CBS. This is an internet story, nothing more.If we did not have a 24 hour news cycle, it wouldn't have been brought up at all. Who the heck cares? The woman can't utter an intelligible sentence, yet she hides behind her FACEBOOK page where someone else writes scathing, and untrue, criticism of the President. She cannot be taken seriously, because she is only out there running around for the money, when she preaches about what a fine mother she is for bringing her 'blessing' Trigg into the world, then giving him to someone else to raise. The truly fine moms I know with handicapped children are out there in support groups, taking the kids to therapy, and raising money. What is Sarah doing? She was supposed to be this advocate for all families dealing with handicapped children, and she has done NOTHING in 2 years for them. No foundations, no schools, no money donated to anyone. She is a grifter and a liar, and extremely annoying no matter what bra she wears.
6
Breast Inplants http://www.breastinplants.net/index.html
June 15th, 2010 - 7:39:22 PM
Well, is she saying it is a breast lift and not silicon Breast Inplants http://www.breastinplants.net/index.html ? I'm missing the picture here.
7
WSJ blog
June 16th, 2010 - 11:28:19 AM
Hey Moron, it has nothing to do with liberal media. Boobs as a headline sell. WSJ blog ran a piece on it and they are anything but liberal. Think a little bit for once you second-tiered, public education p.o.s. This piece is just more cliche bull.
8
n
June 18th, 2010 - 6:03:27 PM
Moodily
9
vvvv
November 7th, 2010 - 11:23:17 PM
fdddddddddddddddddddh
10