
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lou O&#8217; Bedlam&#8217;s Friday Feature: Meaghan O&#8217; Connell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.manolith.com/2010/03/05/lou-o-bedlams-friday-feature-meaghan-o-connell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.manolith.com/2010/03/05/lou-o-bedlams-friday-feature-meaghan-o-connell/</link>
	<description>Man Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:27:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://www.manolith.com/2010/03/05/lou-o-bedlams-friday-feature-meaghan-o-connell/comment-page-1/#comment-16661</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manolith.com/?p=55464#comment-16661</guid>
		<description>To &quot;nickmaynard&quot;:
That&#039;s the point though, isn&#039;t it? &quot;Girl&quot; isn&#039;t the equivalent of &quot;Guy&quot;; it&#039;s it equivalent of &quot;Boy&quot;, and the fact that you don&#039;t realize that you&#039;re referring to a woman as a child with the word &quot;girl&quot; (by definition), is exactly the point. 
Recently a man said to me that a woman not shaving her legs is like a man shaving HIS legs. Well, it&#039;s not. It&#039;s the opposite, except for the fact that society has led most people to believe that a woman shaving her legs is the natural thing to do. In the same way, calling a woman &quot;girl&quot; is demeaning if you think outside of what &quot;our society thinks of the term.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To &#8220;nickmaynard&#8221;:<br />
That&#8217;s the point though, isn&#8217;t it? &#8220;Girl&#8221; isn&#8217;t the equivalent of &#8220;Guy&#8221;; it&#8217;s it equivalent of &#8220;Boy&#8221;, and the fact that you don&#8217;t realize that you&#8217;re referring to a woman as a child with the word &#8220;girl&#8221; (by definition), is exactly the point.<br />
Recently a man said to me that a woman not shaving her legs is like a man shaving HIS legs. Well, it&#8217;s not. It&#8217;s the opposite, except for the fact that society has led most people to believe that a woman shaving her legs is the natural thing to do. In the same way, calling a woman &#8220;girl&#8221; is demeaning if you think outside of what &#8220;our society thinks of the term.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joyoussalutations</title>
		<link>http://www.manolith.com/2010/03/05/lou-o-bedlams-friday-feature-meaghan-o-connell/comment-page-1/#comment-16656</link>
		<dc:creator>joyoussalutations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manolith.com/?p=55464#comment-16656</guid>
		<description>I refer to women of all ages as ladies.  Young old etc. It conveys a certain amount of chivalrousness and respect for the lady that you are talking to. I am a bloke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I refer to women of all ages as ladies.  Young old etc. It conveys a certain amount of chivalrousness and respect for the lady that you are talking to. I am a bloke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickmaynard</title>
		<link>http://www.manolith.com/2010/03/05/lou-o-bedlams-friday-feature-meaghan-o-connell/comment-page-1/#comment-16644</link>
		<dc:creator>nickmaynard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manolith.com/?p=55464#comment-16644</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ve definitely given some thought to this same issue. as much as i agree with your logic, i still think it&#039;s important that we have informal terms for things. i totally buy the argument that &quot;girl&quot; can seem like it &quot;frames them as children&quot;, but what word is acceptable then? i&#039;ve always viewed &quot;girl&quot; as the feminine equivalent of &quot;guy&quot;.

if you were to refer to a guy as &quot;boy&quot;, i totally agree that it would have the kind of connotation that you&#039;re talking about here. but i just don&#039;t think our society thinks of the term &quot;girl&quot; that way.

great article, very thoughtful and thought provoking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve definitely given some thought to this same issue. as much as i agree with your logic, i still think it&#8217;s important that we have informal terms for things. i totally buy the argument that &#8220;girl&#8221; can seem like it &#8220;frames them as children&#8221;, but what word is acceptable then? i&#8217;ve always viewed &#8220;girl&#8221; as the feminine equivalent of &#8220;guy&#8221;.</p>
<p>if you were to refer to a guy as &#8220;boy&#8221;, i totally agree that it would have the kind of connotation that you&#8217;re talking about here. but i just don&#8217;t think our society thinks of the term &#8220;girl&#8221; that way.</p>
<p>great article, very thoughtful and thought provoking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale E. Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.manolith.com/2010/03/05/lou-o-bedlams-friday-feature-meaghan-o-connell/comment-page-1/#comment-16588</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale E. Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 05:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manolith.com/?p=55464#comment-16588</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sweetie&quot; or &quot;Girl&quot; ... I notice that I&#039;ve said them and cringe a little. Thanks for speaking out! Maybe I will start to catch them before they become sounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sweetie&#8221; or &#8220;Girl&#8221; &#8230; I notice that I&#8217;ve said them and cringe a little. Thanks for speaking out! Maybe I will start to catch them before they become sounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

