Comments on: Los Alamos Tests Go Horribly Wrong

By: ablmc

ablmc — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 17:47:54 +0000

Well really – what do you expect if you write such uninformed drivel. It is not a weapon. Extensive information on this equipment, including what it is for and how it is used, is freely available if you know how to use google scholar.

By: Mark Lorenz

Mark Lorenz — Sat, 26 Dec 2009 20:53:41 +0000

OOOOOH, BURN.

By: ablmc

ablmc — Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:00:49 +0000

From your post you obviously couldn’t even read and comprehend it, let alone quote it.

By: Mark Lorenz

Mark Lorenz — Fri, 25 Dec 2009 14:09:55 +0000

Yes, but I couldn’t quote that entire passage. Boob.

By: nukem

nukem — Fri, 25 Dec 2009 13:55:52 +0000

Sensational journalism is irresponsible journalism.
The LBPG isn’t “pointed” at anything – boob.
From the NNSA spokesman:
“Here are the facts: On December 16, Los Alamos conducted a standard proof test on a new design for a catch tank in the target chamber for one of our large bore powder guns (LBPG). These types of experiments are routine and responsible. The LBPG is used to conduct measurements of material properties at pressures needed for understanding nuclear weapons performance. During this particular test, unexpected explosive damage occurred and, because that damage could result in $1 million in damages, an investigation was automatically triggered. That investigation will seek to identify the cause of the incident and any changes in procedures that might be required. NNSA, Los Alamos, and all of our facilities take their commitment to safety very seriously. It is important to note that no personnel were injured from this event, no hazardous or radioactive materials were involved, and that lab’s incident response mechanisms appear to have performed as intended.”