Comments on: Unsurprisingly, Corpulent Wall Street Billionaire Is Also A Criminal http://www.manolith.com/2009/10/16/unsurprisingly-corpulent-wall-street-billionaire-is-also-a-criminal/ Man Guide Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:45:12 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: karl http://www.manolith.com/2009/10/16/unsurprisingly-corpulent-wall-street-billionaire-is-also-a-criminal/comment-page-1/#comment-10087 karl Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:47:19 +0000 http://www.manolith.com/?p=41266#comment-10087 he was found guilty for insider trading anyway, bankers have long been better mobsters than the mob ever was, it'd be good if more people realized that. he was found guilty for insider trading

anyway, bankers have long been better mobsters than the mob ever was, it’d be good if more people realized that.

]]> By: Derek http://www.manolith.com/2009/10/16/unsurprisingly-corpulent-wall-street-billionaire-is-also-a-criminal/comment-page-1/#comment-9990 Derek Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:17:02 +0000 http://www.manolith.com/?p=41266#comment-9990 Maybe I read it wrong (upside down) but I fail to grasp what it is that this guy did... other than achieve a lifelong goal of being the Indian Michelin Man for Halloween. It read like this to me: Quasi funny, psuedosocial commentary. Then a fat joke intro followed by confusion, a little elaboration on Raj, humorous insight, and more humor. Then an irrelevant Chappelle Show reference. the question is really what'd he do? Unless of course this is an elaborate and genius hook (because now I need to know more) the article sucks. Maybe I read it wrong (upside down) but I fail to grasp what it is that this guy did… other than achieve a lifelong goal of being the Indian Michelin Man for Halloween. It read like this to me:

Quasi funny, psuedosocial commentary. Then a fat joke intro followed by confusion, a little elaboration on Raj, humorous insight, and more humor. Then an irrelevant Chappelle Show reference.

the question is really what’d he do? Unless of course this is an elaborate and genius hook (because now I need to know more) the article sucks.

]]>