
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 50 Vintage Playboy Covers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.manolith.com/2009/08/26/50-vintage-playboy-covers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.manolith.com/2009/08/26/50-vintage-playboy-covers/</link>
	<description>Man Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:40:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lana</title>
		<link>http://www.manolith.com/2009/08/26/50-vintage-playboy-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-36742</link>
		<dc:creator>Lana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 00:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manolith.com/?p=37107#comment-36742</guid>
		<description>Thank you for another fantastic article. Where else could anyone get that kind of info in such an ideal way of writing? I&#039;ve a presentation next week, and I am on the look for such information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for another fantastic article. Where else could anyone get that kind of info in such an ideal way of writing? I&#8217;ve a presentation next week, and I am on the look for such information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Koowie</title>
		<link>http://www.manolith.com/2009/08/26/50-vintage-playboy-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-34555</link>
		<dc:creator>Koowie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 20:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manolith.com/?p=37107#comment-34555</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.koowie.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The vintage Playboys look so tame compared to todays.  But classic is beauty! Koowie.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.koowie.com" rel="nofollow">The vintage Playboys look so tame compared to todays.  But classic is beauty! Koowie.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Design That Rocks</title>
		<link>http://www.manolith.com/2009/08/26/50-vintage-playboy-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-17403</link>
		<dc:creator>Design That Rocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manolith.com/?p=37107#comment-17403</guid>
		<description>These covers are such iconic symbols of the times....great stuff! I personally only owned one of them...the Madonna issue. And yes, I still have it.

Great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These covers are such iconic symbols of the times&#8230;.great stuff! I personally only owned one of them&#8230;the Madonna issue. And yes, I still have it.</p>
<p>Great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.manolith.com/2009/08/26/50-vintage-playboy-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-7923</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manolith.com/?p=37107#comment-7923</guid>
		<description>The early &#039;70s covers are all great, but MAN, those &#039;60s covers? Outstanding. I&#039;m not sure if they got a different cover designer in 74 or something, but you can definitely see the difference. Not in a good way either, imo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The early &#8217;70s covers are all great, but MAN, those &#8217;60s covers? Outstanding. I&#8217;m not sure if they got a different cover designer in 74 or something, but you can definitely see the difference. Not in a good way either, imo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

